Find over 25,000 psychological definitions


specific phobia

an anxiety disorder, formerly called simple phobia, characterized by a marked and persistent fear of a specific object, activity, or situation (e.g., dogs, blood, flying, heights). The fear is traditionally defined as excessive or unreasonable and is invariably triggered by the presence or anticipation of the feared object or situation, which is either avoided or endured with marked anxiety or distress. In DSM–IV–TR, specific phobias are classified into five subtypes: (a) animal type, which includes fears of animals or insects (e.g., cats, dogs, birds, mice, ants, snakes); (b) natural environment type, which includes fears of entities in the natural surroundings (e.g., heights, storms, water, lightning); (c) blood-injection-injury type, which includes fears of seeing blood or an injury and of receiving an injection or other invasive medical procedure; (d) situational type, which includes fear of public transportation, elevators, bridges, driving, flying, enclosed places (see claustrophobia), and so forth; and (e) other type, which includes fears that cannot be classified under any of the other subtypes (e.g., fears of choking, vomiting, or contracting an illness; children’s fears of clowns or loud noises). DSM–5 retains these subtypes, but it omits the traditional characterization that each fear type must be excessive or unreasonable to meet diagnostic criteria, stipulating instead that the fear must arise out of proportion to the actual danger posed by the feared object or situation or to its context. A fear of loud noises, for example, would be considered understandable if experienced in the context of a war zone and thus would not qualify as a specific phobia.

Browse dictionary by letter

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

Psychology term of the day

December 26th 2024

ipsative scale

ipsative scale

a scale in which the points distributed to the various different items must sum to a specific total. In such a scale, all participants will have the same total score but the distribution of the points among the various items will differ for each individual. For example, a supervisor using an ipsative scale to indicate an employee’s strength in different areas initially might assign 20 points for communication, 30 for timeliness, and 50 for work quality but a few months later assign 30 points for communication, 30 for timeliness, and 40 for quality of work. The total number of points distributed in each case, however, is the same (100). Ipsative scales also may involve ranks: Respondents use the same numbers for ranking but may assign them differently. For example, two individuals indicating their preferences for 10 different restaurants will both use the ranks 1 through 10 but the restaurant chosen as #1 will not be the same for each person, the restaurant chosen as #2 will not be the same, and so on.